|
CaliforniaFocus on Diabetes:Disparities in Treatment: By IncomeThe map below shows whether the gap in the rate of HbA1c testing between people with diabetes with low income compared to high income within a State is worse than, similar to, or better than the gap that exists across all States with data. For 2002-2004, the gap in HbA1c testing for people with diabetes for people with low income (under $15,000) compared to high income ($50,000 or more).![]() ![]() HbA1c monitoring uses a blood test that indicates to a health care provider how well a patient's diabetes has been controlled. It is an important test that helps providers monitor and guide patients to minimize and avoid serious complications. In the map above:
For 2002-2004, the gap in HbA1c testing for people with diabetes for people with low income (under $15,000) compared to high income ($50,000 or more). The gap is worse than the all-State gap in the following States: California, Colorado, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas, and Utah. The gap is similar to the all-State gap in the following States: Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming. The gap is better than the all-State gap in the following States: Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin. There is insufficient data for these States: Illinois, Michigan, and Oregon.
These categories are based on comparisons of the relative rates of HbA1c testing for people with diabetes within the two income groups in each State relative to the all-State rates for those income groups, for the period 2002–2004. Data are from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. For more information, select Methods on the left menu. The chart below shows the rate at which HbA1c monitoring was done for people who are in low- or high-income groups within the State, the region, and all States. Percent of People in California With Diabetes Who Had an HbA1c Test, by Income, 2002 to 2004.![]() Percent of People in California With Diabetes Who Had an HbA1c Test, by Income, 2002 to 2004. Barchart. For low income (under $15,000), the percentage in California is 66.5; the percentage in the Pacific is 68.7; and the percentage in all States is 83.0. For high income ($50,000 or more), the percentage in California is 80.5; the percentage in the Pacific is 82.9; and the percentage in all States is 91.9.
The bar chart represents the percent of people with diabetes who had an HbA1c test in the previous 12 months for the period 2002–2004. Data are from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. For more information, select Methods on the left menu. |
||||||||