Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
AHRQ Home | Questions? | Contact Us | Site Map | What's New | Browse | Información en español | E-mail UpdatesE-mail Updates
www.ahrq.gov

2009 State Snapshots Home
Getting Started
State Selection Map
What's New
State-Specific Information
State Dashboard
Overall Health Care Quality
Strongest and Weakest Measures
Types of Care
Settings of Care
Care by Clinical Area
Focus on Diabetes
Focus on Asthma
Focus on Healthy People 2010
Focus on Clinical Preventive Services
Focus on Disparities
Focus on Payer
 All Payers
 
Privately Insured
 Medicare
 Medicaid
 Uninsured
Focus on Variation Over Time
State Rankings for Selected Measures
Contextual Factors
Other Information
All-State Data Tables for All Measures
Snapshot Print Version
Other State Snapshot Years
Step-by-Step User's Guide
Interpretation of Results
Methods
Technical Assistance

Related Links
Measuring Healthcare Quality
Health Care Report Card Compendium
Health Care Innovations Exchange
 

Minnesota

Focus on Payer

How Does the Quality of Care for Privately Insured Compare to the US?


Compared to the U.S., the performance for Minnesota in quality of care for privately-insured hospitalizations is in the average range.
The position of the solid arrow represents the State's performance meter score for the most recent data year.

What performance measures make up this meter? (select this link or the Meter)

How are measures represented by a performance meter? (select this link or Methods)

What contextual factors might influence this State's performance? (select this link or Contextual Factors)


The meter above represents Minnesota's balance of below average, average, and above average measures compared to the U.S. for privately-insured hospitalizations. The performance meter score is based on up to 15 measures of quality of care and is reported only if at least five measures are available. A State receives a stronger performance meter score as the number of measures for which the State is doing better than the U.S. increases. A State receives a weaker performance meter score as the number of measures for which the State is worse than the U.S increases.

Compared to the U.S., the performance for Minnesota is in the average range.

State Hospital Care Measures for Privately Insured Compared to the U.S.
These AHRQ Inpatient Quality Indicators and Patient Safety Indicators refer to inpatient deaths and potentially avoidable complications.
Hospital Care Measures MN
Rate
(Private)		 US Rate
(Private)		 MN
Compared to US
(Private)

 Hospital Mortality
 
Deaths per 1,000 admissions with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair DSU 55.16 DNC
Deaths per 1,000 admissions with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), age 40 and over 25.80 23.59 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.
Deaths per 1,000 discharges for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) 76.28 73.74 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.
Deaths per 1,000 adult admissions with congestive heart failure (CHF) 48.51 41.42 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.
Deaths per 1,000 adult admissions with pneumonia 47.08 49.66 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.
Deaths per 1,000 adults with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), age 40 and over 10.67 11.00 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.

 Hospital Safety
 
Deaths per 1,000 admissions in low-mortality DRGs 0.47 0.54 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.
Iatrogenic pneumothorax per 1,000 discharges 0.47 0.63 indicates that the State is performing better than the U.S.
Selected infections due to medical care per 1,000 discharges 1.31 1.99 indicates that the State is performing better than the U.S.
Postoperative septicemia per 1,000 elective surgical discharges of 4 or more days 9.08 13.78 indicates that the State is performing better than the U.S.
Postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence per 1,000 discharges 2.56 2.51 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.

 Hospital Birth/ Obstetrics
 
Birth trauma injury to neonate per 1,000 selected live births 2.22 1.50 indicates that the State is performing worse than the U.S.
Obstetric trauma per 1,000 instrument-assisted deliveries 205.39 184.92 indicates that the State is performing worse than the U.S.
Obstetric trauma per 1,000 vaginal deliveries without instrument assistance 45.35 42.99 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.
Obstetric trauma per 1,000 Cesarean deliveries 5.07 4.27 indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.


State Compared to U.S.:
indicates that the State is performing better than the U.S.indicates that the State is performing better than the U.S.
indicates that the State is performing worse than the U.S.indicates that the State is performing worse than the U.S.
indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.indicates that the State is performing similar to the U.S.

The symbols are based on a differential of at least 10 percent.
DSU:  Data do not meet the criteria for statistical reliability, data quality, or confidentiality.
DNC:  Data were not collected.